Nude Pictures of Miss California Surface

Carrie Prejean Nude

Miss California, Carrie Prejean, who we all know as Miss opposite marriage has become a sort of spokeswoman for the anti-gay marriage movement, but new racy pictures of Prejean are popping up on the internet that threaten her squeaky clean image.

I think it's great to pose nude and in racy pictures, I actually have quite an affinity for them. But it's another matter to claim you're on some moral high ground to judge others when you're not exactly living by the Bible.

This is supposedly the first of many pictures to show up, and the rest are more revealing. The moral of the story? Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

– Andy

Photo Credit: TheDirty.com

14 thoughts on “Nude Pictures of Miss California Surface

  1. Smart move on her part. I’d want to distance myself from this whole fiasco, too, once I made headlines. Sexing it up a bit’s the way to go.

  2. If this is all you can do for this story, then you need to get a life! I have seen more ravealing stuff on TV! This is just some queens trying to pull her down! Typical gays who are Intollerant, and full of Hate of others for what they stand for or Belive! She was showing more in her swim ware scene on stage then this shows!!

  3. Paul Dearest. Since you are obviously not gay then why bother us here on this board? And if you are gay then why the self loathing? A hypocrite is a hypocrite. Why not point it out? Sad, so sad.

  4. This is supposedly another way more liberal nuts can make a story out of nothing. You wanna criticize hypocrites, take a look at the gay community touting tolerance and see how that is such a huge fallacy. Politically, take a look at Barney Frank’s involvement with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He and his then-boyfriend gouged millions of taxpayer’s monies. Yet he can sit and discuss ethics on any given congressional panel.

  5. What a dumb blond bitch to be hating on others. She’s just angry that gay guys are too good to not want her skanky ass.

  6. This is probably pointless, but navymscle, she hates gay people and the gay lifestyle. So why support her? She is not supporting us. Really, why do you hate yourself for being gay too? And why not just move on?

  7. Furthermore, navymscle, gay people never claim to be perfect. This woman has nothing to do with Barney Frank’s ethics. I don’t hate straight people and there are plenty of gay people I do not like. But the point is her attack on us and our rights. I don’t know what more I can say because you obviously do not like yourself. What is your name on the mainboard? I would love to see what you look like but I expect you do not have a profile. Hugs and peace.

  8. wrestletp, you should be more respectful of people with conservative opinions( or maybe you are, but your sweetness comes off as false and condescending the way it is written here). They do come in all shapes, sizes, and orientations.
    And what do you expect from the military types? They tend to come from conservative backgrounds and are indoctrinated with conservative beliefs either way. If you had bothered to search, navymscle does indeed have a profile under the same name. Or some old dude with a beautiful ass does, anyway.

  9. E-man. I just don’t get it. You need to reread navymscle’s posting. It is not exactly tolerant of liberals. I was never critical of him being conservative, but he did basically call me a liberal nut. Where is his tolerance? We are all different and entitled to our opinions – even me. Apparently you think constrained thoughtful writing is fake. You have always been critical of my posts so I guess I will stop so that you can have the run of this forum. You seem to want the control. Best of luck to you.

  10. ??? I have criticized you once, maybe twice? I think “always” is a bit of overgeneralizing. YOU were the one criticizing ME last time, for my criticism of Dewitt.
    I DID acknowledge that you might have been genuine, but whatever the intention, “Dearest” and “Sad, so sad.” come across as extremely condescending.
    I didn’t see navymscle’s comment as a personal attack on you, though I could be wrong, and I rather thought his comments about hypocrisy had some weight: I do agree that attacking her opinions on gay marriage by criticizing her nude modeling smacks of argument ad hominem(?) – though you were right to call him on his own logical fallacies.
    Nah, I don’t want to be the only intelligent voice left here, please stick around.

  11. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and it would kinda hypocritical of us to try and force a change…as for that id rather force some clothes on her…..vaginas are gross

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.