I kept going back and forth about whether Clayton Archer and Brock Landon were “woofy” enough our Woof Alert feature. In the end, I came to the conclusion that what they lack in “bearishness”, they made up for with all their salt and pepper, DILF-y goodness. Why worry about all the meaningless labels and categorizations? Plain and simple, they’re hot.
My only complaint about this scene is that Clayton’s kind of a boring top. When it all comes down to it, I want to see a guy like Brock getting roughed up and pounded like a bitch. Clayton just sticks it in and then cums on his face. That’s cool and all, but they’d be better off if they invited me next time. I’d bend them both over and work those fuzzy holes.
– Dewitt
Photo credit: Dirty Tony
Click through to watch Clayton and Brock in action:
They are disturbingly similar in appearance.
i LIKE
Very, very sexy dudes. Love the salt and pepper look.
I thought Brock was hot, but Clayton’s ass was wayyyy too flat for my tastes.
i thought Brock is very hot and deserved to have his ass played wit a lot before pounding his hot hole
“I want to see a guy…getting roughed up and pounded like a bitch.” I thought you weren’t into BDSM?ace. That’s cool and all, but they’d be better off i”
I’m into rough, aggressive, passionate and sweaty sex, which I’d argue is VERY different from BDSM.
Agreed. The fucking is not convincing.
I mean they’re doing it, but they not doing it
Rough sex is a type of BDSM.
::shrug::
Then I guess I’m into some form of BDSM? I’ve never put it that way, since the implications of “BDSM” are usually interpreted otherwise.
Plenty woofy for me.
Though I wouldn’t mind if it were more of a facial, less of a… neckal?
BDSM is consensual power exchange. When you agree to let another guy make you his bitch, you’re exchanging power with him for a while. I realize people don’t often think of it that way, but BDSM is a lot more widespread than people realize. Lots of guys are into some facet of BDSM without realizing that’s what they’re doing.