Ignore these two guys! This post is actually about Julian Smiles, the slightly-muscular young man who’s going to shove his dick into both of them. We’re disguising this as a Twink Tank meets Fuck Vs. Fuck competition, in which Kyle Ross faces off against gay porn’s favorite Kurt Hummel impersonator Sencer Keve… But you know the real deal. These sluts don’t matter.
Though, if we’re being perfectly honest, Kyle and Sencer do put on some great performances in the bedroom. Who’s the best bottom? Who’s the loudest moaner? Who would you rather watch Julian Smiles fuck, because (really) why is anyone else being mentioned in this post besides Julian Smiles?
– Dewitt
Photo credit: Helix Studios
Click through to watch both scenes and cast your vote:
KYLE ROSS & JULIAN SMILES:
___________________________________________________________
SENCER KEVE & JULIAN SMILES:
Sencer always kinda creeped me out
where do these guys come up with their names? Did his parents forget the “p” in Spencer, was it a family name, or just another case of wanting his name to be
“special”? (UGH)
gross
Much prefer Mr. Smiles 🙂
You mean cause he looks 10? I have no idea what the appeal of a guy like that is.
More stupid tattoos, tops that suck the bottoms’ dicks, condoms, and bottoms that look like tomboy females. I WILL PASS.
You realize these are stage-names right?
I’m pretty sure they’re just pseudonyms that the company picks for them.
You really think someone names their kid “Marus Mojo?”
MY BUDDY. MY BUDDY. WHEREVER I GO.. HE GOES.. MY BUDDY.. MY BUDDY! MY BUDDY AND ME. (remember that doll? cuz that’s what they look like. D: )
As much as I believe in to-each-their-own in the gay world, this catering to neo-pedophile/ephebophile fetishes has crossed the line. Nothing is absolute and certain ethical boundaries should never be stepped over. This blog-posting featuring this is repulsive. Anyone who finds it hot is demented and possibly dangerous.
This is borderline pedo. Gross.
They are both very cute youg guys..and do a great job here. Nice to see some youth for a change. Thanks.
Casting porn stars who look so young is wrong on so many levels. The fact that the top seems happy to fuck jail bait look-a-likes is even worse.
So why view it?
Everytime I look at a twink I feel like the world is going to label me as a pedophile, which I’m not!
yuck & yuck
Really?
I wont advocate the phebophilic position, but I will say that I was incredibly young looking for a very long time, as in still getting carded for R rated movies past the age of 25. I’m 30 now, but I usually still get carded if I go for a drink…does this mean no one should have been attracted to me because I looked like I was in my teens well into my twenties?? These people are of age…
Also pay attention to nearly everything in advertising…there not so subtley nuanced pedophilia as an undertone to I’d estimate about 60-70% of advertising campaigns.
Wow, didn’t realise it was legal for under age lads to have sex, gross. They look like they are both 10 yrs old, and the blonde reminds me of the movie Midwitch cuckoo’s where young blonde kids wreck havoc, death and mayhem in a village.
Theses are not men, give me men who look likke men!
So, that’s what it’s like to fuck a human pipe cleaner.
If your’e gay and that skinny, you’re kinda disgusting.
Jerry, vodkarose, steve et al – back in the 60s, when LGBTs in America faced harsher penalties under the law than many citizens of communist dictatorships, NAMBLA was fighting for your current right to suck on hairy dick. Harry Hay Jr. stopped attending pride parades in SF because they banned organizations that didn’t conform to the revisionist view of sexuality that panders to conservatives. The bigoted right wing has irrationally attempted to associate homosexuality with child abuse as criticism, and most gays have bitten the bait, competing among themselves to see who’s further to the right of evangelicals on ‘keeping our kids safe’ from the menace of sex.
The notion that young men of this age are physically or psychologically unsuited to sexual activity is baseless (I’m sure you can look no further than your past selves as examples). The notion that they are aesthetically revolting contradicts plenty of present and past opinion. Pederasty has a long and proud history in sociology, in art, and in standing up for the general rights of sexual minorities. The notion that this blog is pandering to ‘neo-pedophiles’ by having an occasional post of legally aged young men is beyond description. You’d make great staff aides in Rick Santorum’s presidential campaign.
Yes, it means that no one should have been attracted to you if they thought you were in your teens, despite you being in your twenties. They were perverted, twisted and criminal ephebophiles. They should have been attracted to MEN. Being attracted to teenagers when one is an adult is not homosexuality – it is ephebophilia, and ephebophilia, like pedophilia, is a sexual perversion.
Shame on manhunt for promoting stuff like this. It keeps up the stereotype that gays like them young, young, YOUNG, and now it pushed the envelope too far is posting this garbage. So what if the ones in these pornos are of legal age? They create the effect that they are NOT. It doesn’t matter if the models are 18; if they are designed to look like they’re 13, it’s a loophole way of promoting child porn. And manhuntdaily shows this. Again, manhunt thinks everyone wants them young, young, YOUNG to the point that this filth is displayed.
When was the last time manhuntdaily featured pics and videos of guys in their 50’s, 60’s, 70’s, etc.? There are plenty out there. There are plenty of manhunt members who think mature men are hot, but that demographic is ignored by manhunt. All it wants is to show young, young, YOUNG, to the point we now have pseudo-child-porn on this blog. So when, again, was the last time mature men (meaning in the age range I’ve stated, and even older) were featured here? Oh, that’s right. NEVER. Features regarding the base membership are verboten; features regarding neo-criminal activity are common-place.
@Jerry – Does Playboy magazine regularly feature women in their 50s, 60s and 70s? Youth as attractiveness is one of mankind’s most general principles. This blog does nothing of the kind that you’re talking about. Bears are well represented, and most men posted, as with every other gay publication I’m aware of, are past young adulthood.
I also think you’re the biggest and saddest hypocrite I’ve ever come across online. You, a homosexual out of all people, a man considered mentally ill by the APA until 1971 and criminally prosecuted throughout the USA until this very century, are preaching righteousness on what sexual attractions are unhealthy or immoral, even though the ‘criminals’ you’re condemning have fought for your right to not be seen as a social pariah. You’re worse than heterosexual homophobes: you’re a gay Uncle Tom. Harry Hay Jr., Larry Kramer, the Mattachine Society and all ‘founding fathers’ of gay rights aimed at sexual liberation from traditional mores, not the upkeep of what the political consensus has gradually determined is the ‘acceptable’ version of watered down homosexuality.
I refuse to associate myself with a gay rights movement that pays lip service to equality while joining fanatical conservatives in the irrational condemnation of youth sexuality. It pays no respect to either past or present reality.
eh your whole argument is a veiled attempt to paint people who prefer more youthful builds as immoral perverts – they’re of age, period. Remember, opinions are like assholes…
Sencer Keve is so cute <3
your heeft nice assss
your heeft nice assss