Manhunt Daily Wood: Ryan Hughes

Ryan Hughes is gracing the cover of the latest issue of DNA magazine. The bad news? He’s still not smiling. In fact, he’s still regarding us like we’re blocking his TV during the ninth inning with a tie game, two outs, and bases loaded.

The good news? He’s still hot as balls. Hughes doesn’t have much variation in his pissy expression, but it matters little when he’s pulling his underwear down and grabbing his balls for the camera. DNA needs to have a contest in which readers enter to win his DNA. And he should show up to your place to deliver it personally. And fresh. Into an available orifice.

– J. Harvey

Photo credit: Thomas Synnamon

For more pics of Ryan, Follow the JUMP:

686 thoughts on “Manhunt Daily Wood: Ryan Hughes

  1. Great body … definitely needs more facial expressions. Don’t these model photographers say “give me ‘happy'” or “give me ‘excited'” from time to time? I can imagine how much hotter his pics would be if he actually looked like he was enjoying himself …

  2. Yep, J. Harvey pretty much summed it up–an AMAZING body but wank-off material potential ruined but that ridiculous “hard” look at the camera that seems to be so popular now.

    And why?  He’s dressed/posed as an athlete, so why can’t he be excited about winning the game and smile?  And he’s so pretty and well-groomed, I don’t think anyone’s going to mistake him for a gangster or something.

    Sigh, another major photog fail.

  3. He would look too cheesy if he smiled…keep the scowl…people dont buy this magazine for the smiles

  4. Impressive body but, I’d prefer it if he actually looked like he’s enjoying himself (at least a grin) ;-)lol

  5. Why smile? These guys, except for the exhibitionists, aren’t doing this because they like it. They do the photo shoots  because the money is there that allows them to do what they really want to do. And I think his “look” is rather refreshing, no fake smile and pearly whites flashing at you. That “look” must work for him, he’s being featured in a lot of top photo shoots.

  6. Am I really the only one, who’s not repulsed by his look, or even just resigned to it because of the mechanics behind the industry, or his motives? Admittedly, I’ve got a bad history with an attraction to “jerk” types, but I kind of like the idea of a guy who’s not readily accessible… Would “surly” be the right word, here? Either way, the look does it for me–*clears throat*–and the body doesn’t hurt his case, either!

  7. I don’t understand the hate.  I could stare into those eyes, run my
    fingers through that fuzzy hair, kiss that smooth chest, and eat that
    juicy ass for days… 😛

  8. Well clearly he has found A(!) look that works for him and he’s workin’ it hard.  He’s crazy hot and has a banging bod but does need to work on finding a second look.

  9. Sorry, just now seeing this.

    It’s one thing if you have a blank expression for ONE of your photos, as the guy did from whom you lifted my quote.  It’s another thing when you have FIVE photos and every single one of them has the exact same blank stare.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.