I’m Coming Out: Realizing My Full Potential As A Bareback Cum Dump

51 thoughts on “I’m Coming Out: Realizing My Full Potential As A Bareback Cum Dump”

1. This was just disgusting – sloppy low shot and – well – digesting. YUCK!

2. Nothing about that story or the concept was attractive. Seriously?

3. I can’t believe you would publish this shit. HIV is still a threat and we need to eliminate the fetishisation of bareback sex.

4. This makes me want to weep and then shoot myself in the head.

5. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves. Absolutely nothing about this is attractive or even remotely okay in any way, shape or form.

6. Manhunt continues its promotion of barebacking. The funny thing is that its parent company has been working with researchers to develop HIV prevention apps (mostly for testing and linkage to care, but some “risk reduction”). They want to insulate themselves from litigation while propagating garbage like this.

7. Don’t shoot yourself in the head. Shoot the people who are behind Manhunt in the head!

8. Everyone’s kinda freaking out… But I love bareback sex and getting my hole filled with cum. If you do it with other clean people you’ll be fine. Y’all need to calm down and stop getting so emotional.

9. Clean? You mean as long as they use soap when they shower? So much for people trying to remove the stigma from HIV status . . . when others continue to carelessly use words and terms that just reinforce stigma. “Clean”, meaning “sti free and hiv neg” to “dirty” meaning “hiv+”?

   Sounds like we all need an honest discussion about sex, HIV / STI’s, and stigma . . .

10. lol? is this real or just something frat x+ created as a promo?

11. Sigh, let’s get overly emotional about the word clean. You know what I meant. Stop trying to make yourself look all insightful and smart.

12. This is hilarious. Only cause it’s exactly why I can’t get into sites like sketchysex or fratx. Maybe I don’t understand what’s appealing in being/watching “cum dumping.”

    But, no judgements against those that do. Best of luck in all of your cum dumping endeavors Straight (no-longer) College Boy!

13. My thoughts as well

14. How about saying what you actually mean, instead of using a descriptor that’s VERY offensive to alot of people . . .

15. I simply dont know what to say, you are adamant that this is who you are and you will neer change so nothing we say will deter you. but bro all i can say to you is, you think its nice and all fun now and the fuck is so good and the cum dump is to die for, but the reason why its like this for you now is because you “might” have an healthy status….BUT we are here, we wont go anywhere and we’ll be looking for your posts when you visit the doctor and your status changes….thats when the moment will hit you.dont worry my friend..i hope you speak so then when you wake everyday and your lifespan is shorter and shorter.

16. Aww I get it! You’re a little baby! Isn’t it past your bedtime?

17. “Smoking marijuana plant.” Did someone’s grandmother write this press release? While I agree with everyone about the dangers of bareback sex, stupid people, gay and straight, are doing it everywhere regardless of what Manhunt does. But I do wish MH would develop more of a conscious and drop this advertiser.

18. Complaining that this blog ‘promotes’ bareback sex is like saying The Texas Chainsaw Massacre promotes murder. Grow up. It’s a goofy, fake set up between consenting (presumably) informed adults.

19. So tell me, who’s the more mature / man of the two — who’s not stooping to name-calling and insults?

    For the record, I’m far from being a ‘little baby” . . . I’ve experienced the rejection that can come from a sero-discordant relationship . . . I’ve experienced friends hurting as they explain how they now tested positive after what they thought was a “clean” / safe HOT sexual encounter . . . I’ve been there for friends who talk of the rejection they’ve experienced from someone who isn’t of the same status as them — even just for a casual sexual encounter . . . . and I’ve seen and experienced enough of life to understand that you’re far from being able to have an honest and open discussion about sex and HIV and stigma without resorting to childish behavior and insults.

    I don’t have a problem with you (or anyone else for that matter) enjoying barebacking. I don’t have a problem with sex. I don’t have an issue with sero-sorting, which is what you’re talking about in your original post. However, what many people take issue with is the STIGMA that’s attached by some people, when it comes to the words used to describe . . .. . clean vs dirty, negative vs positive . . .. if “negative” means “clean”, then wow, “dirty” must mean “positive” . . . . and then “dirty” just becomes another means of shaming. And do we really need to be doing more shaming and labelling about sex, about what we all as gay men enjoy? Mainstream culture “shames” us enough with categorizing all the LGBT community as “sexual deviants” . . . do we really need to be shaming ourselves as well through words that only serve to widen the divide and hurt people within our own community?

20. And I cant believe that nowadays NATURAL SEX became a tabu….bareback is natural…condoms are not. depends o the situation you use it or not. doing bareback doesnt mean you are going to get infected by HIV, thats only if the other person is infected , is not taking medications and even though is not than easy…you can fuck bareback if the other person is healthy. AND ANYWAY, vve are not in the 80s anymore…currently if you get HIV you only have to take a pill once a day…is not a big deal actually. so is not recomended to have bareback sex vvith strangers, but please, don’t make it a TABU..enjoy life, use condoms for yourself if you feel better and LET THE REST OF PEOPLE ENJOY SEX AS THEY VVANT

    https://38.media.tumblr.com/54276de728eb04cca2e549c9986478a7/tumblr_ndbw7zFIdr1rpbjogo3_400.gif

21. Get your facts straight, you can still get infected even if the person is on meds. The chances of it may be slim but it can and still does happen.

22. To both of you… each of you have misconstrued the original meaning of the word “clean” when it comes to health etc. Many many years ago, when someone went to the doctor and everything was good they would say they have you have a “clean bill of health”.
    But then somewhere a long the way people shortened the expression to clean. And then again, people starting to relate clean with dirty.
    So it would seem that Lex was actually correct in his statement about “other clean people.” RicRio you are the one that changed his statement into clean vs dirty.

23. Yeah you “take a pill”, which still costs a LOT of money. You still have the stigma. We still don’t know if that PreP or whatever the hell it’s called really works or has nasty unknown side effects itself.

    Yes bareback is “natural” but so are the consequences at this time. HIV/AIDS is the worst but there are other almost as nasty which condoms can help prevent.

24. is PROVEN that if the HIV+ is UNDETECTABLE, he can’t infect other person

25. excuse me but IS PEOPLE LIKE YOU, doing these comments who make the STIGMA. and thats what Im talking about, you are making it a tabu, assuming that doing bareback is getting diseases, while getting tested is enough to be sure keep healthy. If people would stop making so much drama about bareback and HIV and get real information, it wont be a stigma anymore. even diseases like diabetes are nowadays more dangerous than an HIV infection

    yes, meds are expensive, thats why public health is so important… in several countries in Europe for example the meds are free… Im sorry for your poor health system, that’s a political issue, BUT at the end o the day, what Im saying is that you can you condoms for yourself, but not telling people what to do. LET PEOPLE ENJOY SEX AS THEY wANT, we are all adults, we can make our own decisions. what the others do is not your business and afterall BAREBACK IS NATURAL SEX, is absurd to turn it into a tabu. Is YOU wHO ARE STIGMATIZING people

26. I’m not for or against bareback sex however I am tired of the MYTH that having unprotected sex with a poz person on meds with an undetectable viral load means they can’t pass the virus.

    Source: http://www.hiv.va.gov/patient/faqs/transmission-of-undetectable-virus.asp

    Q: If taking anti-HIV drugs has made your viral load
    undetectable (meaning that the virus isn’t showing up on blood tests), can you still pass the virus to another person through sex?

    Taking
    anti-HIV drugs (ARVs) is very important for both your health and for reducing your risk of passing HIV to sex partners, but it is not 100% effective at preventing HIV transmission. A large international study looked at heterosexual couples in which one partner was HIV positive and the other was HIV negative. The researchers found that if the positive partners took HIV medications to suppress their viral load, their risk of infecting their partners was enormously reduced. In fact, the rate of HIV infection for the HIV negative partners was 96% lower if the
    positive partner was on ARVs. While we don’t know for sure whether HIV medications will have this huge benefit in preventing HIV transmission between men who have sex with men, or between other types of partners, we think it will. Having said that, it will never be 100% protective for
    all couples.

    There’s no way to know whether suppressing the HIV
    viral load through ARV therapy will be protective for you or for any specific individual. Keep in mind that a viral load test measures the amount of HIV virus in your blood. But sexual partners are usually infected by virus in sexual fluids, such as semen or vaginal or anal secretions. Unfortunately, the viral load in these fluids can be high even when the viral load in blood is low. And factors like STDs (sexually transmitted infections) can increase the risk of HIV transmission.

    It is important to ask your health care provider for advice
    that is specific to you as an individual, and to your partner, in order to get a better idea of your risk for passing HIV and ways that you might lower this risk. And of course, it is really important to have frank and open conversations about HIV transmission with your HIV negative partner(s), so you and they can make informed decisions about what level of risk you are willing to accept.

    Finally, remember that for ARV therapy to be effective it is
    crucial that you take your ARVs every day, as prescribed, in order to keep the HIV virus suppressed to undetectable levels. And, ARV therapy does not take the place of other risk-reduction strategies like condoms and behavioral changes–these are important not just for HIV reduction
    but also for STD prevention and pregnancy prevention.

27. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZ541LDcUYQ&feature=youtu.be

28. is this guy seriously saying that diabetes is worse…

29. it is more difficult to control, indeed. if the HIV infection is diagnosed early and the patient does the treatment properly, the HIV is not a problem at all. diabetes is more complicated

30. is not a myth. many doctors are not usually brave enough to say it because they don’t want to risk anything, but have not been an infection from an undetectable person yet. is science:

    http://www.sciencemag.org/site/special/btoy2011/

31. The article says transmission was reduced by 96 percent, but there were actually 28 out of 1763 negative people that were still infected by their positive partner. It also goes on to say the research was conducted on heterosexual couples not homosexuals.

    HIV transmission is so high in homosexuals because of the tearing of the
    anus during sex makes it easier for a bottom to contract the virus from
    an infected top or pass the virus to a negative top from bleeding from
    anal tearing (although the top is at much lower risk of contraction in
    this scenario).

    It is harder for women to pass HIV to men and the article does not state the sexual practices (oral, vanginal, anal, internal emissions, etc) or frequency of sex done by each couple. It does not state whether the infected people in each relationship were male or female or give the genders of the 28 people that were infected.

    While progress is being made in the right direction doctors are right to be cautious about endorsing this. Ultimately there are too many unknown factors to go around telling people there is no risk having sex with a positive person with an undetectable viral load. I hope for the day when HIV is no longer an issue but that day is not now.

32. vvhen the infection occurs is because the HIV+ one is not UNDETECTABLE yet

33. 1. Nowhere in the article does it say that those that were infected were because their partners were not undetectable, in fact someone from the early group got infected.

    2. Viral loads fluctuate for any number of reasons (other stds, other viruses, skipping a dose of medication, etc), so a viral load test is irrelevant a few days later.

    3. The test only measures the virus in the blood stream and does not measure the amount of the virus in semen or vaginal secretions, so a person with an undetectable viral load may still have other highly infectious bodily fluids.

    4. There have been no test or research to determine how much of the virus in other body fluids there has to be to infect another person.

34. is not in THIS article, but it is in the facst and other studies..has not been an infection caused by an UNDETECTABLE HIV+ person yet

35. By all means share your sources.

36. of course. in on my vvay to make a tesis just for you

37. of course. i’m on my way to make a thesis just for you

    why don’t you find one source that shows how an undetectable person can still infect another person?

38. My first reply did just that. A viral load test only measures HIV in the blood NOT other body fluids like semen which can be highly infectious even when levels in the blood are undetectable.

    A viral load test is unreliable anyway because stress, other viruses/infections, and skipping doses of medication can all alter viral load meaning no one will ever be completely sure of their viral load at all times.

39. http://www.aidsmap.com/No-one-with-an-undetectable-viral-load-gay-or-heterosexual-transmits-HIV-in-first-two-years-of-PARTNER-study/page/2832748/

40. “In order to be in the study, couples have to be having sex
    without condoms at least some of the time. The HIV-negative partner cannot be using
    post-exposure or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PEP or PrEP) and the HIV-positive
    partner has to be on ART, with the most recent viral load below 200 copies/ml.”

    “Some
    couples were excluded from this analysis. In most cases, this was because they
    did not attend follow-up appointments but in 16% of cases it was because the
    HIV-positive partner developed a viral load above 200 copies/ml, and in 3% of
    cases because the HIV-negative partner took PEP or PrEP.”

    “In addition, these results exclude situations where ART failed in the
    HIV positive partner, though there were relatively few of these cases.”

    -So some people on ART with the required undetectable viral load levels showed fluctuations in their viral load making them unknowingly detectable sometime before the next follow up. No wonder they excluded that.

    I’ve said it before, viral load tests are irrelevant because a person can never be sure of their viral load at all times, and this article just proved my point again.

41. you are one of those people who never accept they are wrong, no matter how many proofs… so is worthless to discuss

42. Attack my argument not me.

43. and vvhat kind of argument is that? please…

44. How can a positive person know they are undetectable at all times? The study clearly states that viral loads don’t stay undetectable even on ART for five years.

45. testing?

46. .02% of a chance of getting infected is still a chance. Get your facts straight.

47. that percent is even lower than the condom method. get your facts straight

48. GET YOURSELF EDUCATED!

49. same. condoms fail more times than 2% . condoms can broke (and it happens more often than it should). while treatment keeps the viral load so low that is not enough to cause an infection. GET YOURSELF EDUCATED

50. Right because every one has 190 bucks a day to spend on daily viral load testing.

51. tuculomegusta, YOU ARE DEAD WRONG ON THIS ONE. Please don’t make that literal. Please, I really mean that. I’ve been HIV+ for 26 years. You can bet I know a whole lot more about this than any uninfected person. I am undetectable. Have been for several years. Think about this: The tests are not as sensitive as you seem to think. They are getting better, but there is still a whole lot of that stinkin’ virus stirring around in my body. How do I know? Because in spite of being undetectable for many years, my body is deteriorating at a much faster rate than the average person my age.I take good care of my body yet I suffer health problems that no one my age should. If I were 30 years older, maybe, but not at my age. My T-cell counts float at about 200. In and out of what is considered full blown AIDS, yet I am undetectable. Think about THAT. I wouldn’t for a SECOND consider having unprotected sex and am very hesitant about even protected. I carry Band-aids in my wallet and keep scabs covered until they are gone. Make no mistake, I am a walking talking lethal weapon. And ANY infected person who doesn’t feel the same is criminally selfish living in deep denial no matter how long they’ve been undetectable. It only takes ONE MINISCULE DROP (not even a drop) of my blood to enter your blood stream, and BOOM, you’ve got it. And baby, there is no getting rid of it.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.