I've noticed lately that people have had a tendency to label anyone with a little scruff, hair on their chest or a bit of extra weight a "bear". This is not an accurate designation, but let's not rant about semantics... I'd like to call your attention to
Nick, the boyfriend of equally fuckable photographer,
blogger and pornographer
Jeremy Lucido.
I suppose you could call him an "otter". Maybe just a guy with a beard, piercings and tatts? Or you could just forget about labels and join me in drooling over pics of his furry ass. It's up to you, my friends.
- Dewitt
Photo credit: Jeremy Lucido
For some NSFW pictures of Nick, follow the JUMP:
Dewitt- I have been known as a "bear" for a number of years, and only got the title when I had a combination of fur and size. If there is no fur and you are a big (heavyset??? weighty?? or for some of the less imaginative and more ignorant, "fat"??)guy, you are in what is usually called the "otter" category. If you have fur but are not very large at all, you usually get called a "cub" or a "wolf". Not sure who makes these decisions, but it doesn't matter to me, as there seem to be plenty of men out there that like big, furry, friendly guys like me- except the most of the muscular furry hunks that I drool about . and what's with these furry muscle guys that insist on shaving all that fur off?? ah well, these pics are very nice, and made me drool a bit myself.
Posted by: Randy | May 06, 2009 at 03:20 PM
All of the references I've ever heard about "otters" have been about slim, hairy guys. Is that wrong?
Posted by: Eric | May 06, 2009 at 03:24 PM
There is no "white paper" or official designating criteria established by any standards organization for "bear" or any of these other labels in the culture. So just give up on trying to authoritatively state what does or doesn't constitute one. It's like those famous words by a federal judge: "I can't tell you what pornography is, but I know it when I see it."
Posted by: Scott | May 06, 2009 at 03:46 PM
good one, Scott! And Eric, otters are definitely usually slim guys with moderate hairiness, from what I have observed through others' comments.
Posted by: Randy | May 06, 2009 at 03:51 PM
Generally (your mileage may vary):
bear = fur + bulk
chub = no fur + bulk
otter = fur + slim
wolf = fur + slim + middle-aged
Posted by: Terry C. | May 06, 2009 at 05:44 PM
apart from the tatts and piercings, I can barely differentiate between the two of them. I honestly thought they were brothers or something for a moment.
Posted by: JF | May 06, 2009 at 09:08 PM
Yeah Randy I think you have it backwards. Terry C. seems to have nailed it with the list. I will add: A “cub” or “bearcub” can be either a young bear, or a furry guy who is nowhere near slim enough to be an otter, but smaller than the average bear, though usually slightly overweight.
And of course, there are muscle bears, who are huge for entirely different reasons.
I think the term otter comes from the actual animal which has fur and swims, via a combination of the human descriptors “furry” and “swimmer’s build”.
Posted by: E-man | May 07, 2009 at 04:03 PM
Also they are adorable. I could have sworn I typed that before. Twice.
Posted by: E-man | May 09, 2009 at 01:02 AM